Preston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED the 2 IFP Application is DENIED. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee or her Complaint will be dismissed. Signed by Senior District Judge Raner C Collins on 1/6/25. (BAC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sara Preston, No. CV-24-00583-TUC-LCK Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 Commissioner Administration, 13 of ORDER Social Security Defendant. 14 15 On December 5, 2024, Magistrate Judge Lynette C. Kimmins issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the District Court enter an order denying 17 Plaintiff Sara Preston’s Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP 18 Application”) (Doc. 2) and directing her to pay the filing fee or her Complaint would be 19 subject to dismissal. (Doc. 6.) Judge Kimmins notified the parties they had fourteen days 20 to object to the R&R. (Id.) No objections have been filed. 21 The standard of review of a magistrate judge’s R&R is dependent upon whether a 22 party objects: where there is no objection to a magistrate’s factual or legal 23 determinations, the district court need not review the decision “under a de novo or any 24 other standard.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). The Court has reviewed the IFP Application and the R&R and agrees with the 25 26 Magistrate Judge’s conclusions. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Magistrate Judge's R&R is ADOPTED (Doc. 2 6) and the IFP Application is DENIED (Doc. 2). Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days 3 from the date of this order to pay the fling fee or her Complaint will be dismissed. 4 Dated this 6th day of January, 2025. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?