Burress, et al v. Union Pacific, et al
ORDER denying 380 Motion for Reconsideration, denying 383 MOTION in Limine to Prohibit Expert Testimony of Robert Pottroff and denying 381 MOTION to Substitute Party in Interest. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/25/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION KENNETH WADE BURRESS and PRISCILLA BURRESS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY MISSOURI & NORTHERN ARKANSAS RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. CONAGRA POULTRY COMPANY ORDER Pending are ConAgra's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 380), Motion to Substitute Real Party in Interest (Doc. No. 381), and Motion in Limine to Prohibit Expert Testimony of Robert Pottroff (Doc. No. 383). Union Pacific has responded to each motion.1 Each motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2009. /s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr._________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1:01-CV-00072--WRW DEFENDANTS THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT PLAINTIFFS
Doc. Nos. 387-389.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?