Kendrick et al v. Faust et al
ORDER re 388 389 MOTIONS to Dismiss filed by Catherynne W Kendrick: Pursuant to plaintiff's failure to withdraw these motions to dismiss, her claims against defts Zomant, Dixon and Capel are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/24/10. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION CATHERYNNE W. KENDRICK, ADC #708204 V. CASE NO. 1:07CV00025 JMM/BD DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff previously filed two motions to dismiss (docket entries #388 and #389). The Court granted the motions in part, and denied the motions in part. The Court notified Plaintiff that it intended to dismiss her claims against Defendants Zomant, Dixon, and Capel with prejudice, and Plaintiff was notified of her opportunity to withdraw her motion. The Court specifically cautioned Plaintiff that if she failed to act, the Court would dismiss her claims with prejudice. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a motion to withdraw her motion to dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Zomant, Dixon, and Capel are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2010. PLAINTIFF
NURZUHAL FAUST, et al.
________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court previously notified Plaintiff that it also intended to dismiss Plaintiff's failure to protect and condition of confinement claim with prejudice. The Court, however, dismissed those claims on January 6, 2010. (#396)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?