Wilson v. Maples et al
ORDER ADOPTING 162 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant James Pratt with prejudice; 103 Motion to Dismiss filed by James Pratt is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/18/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION ANGELA DENISE WILSON ADC #708565 V. JOHN MAPLES et al. ORDER The court has reviewed the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the court concludes that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's claims against defendant James Pratt are DISMISSED WITH NO: 1:08CV00041 BSM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
PREJUDICE for failure to introduce sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury. 2. Pratt's pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 103) is DENIED AS MOOT.
DATED this 18th day of December, 2009.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?