Wilson v. Maples et al
ORDER directing that service is appropriate for defts Brandy Wilson, Stephen Gilbert and Linda Dixon pursuant to plaintiff's 6 Objection to Report and Recommendations in which she sets forth specific allegations against these defts; and directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve defts with a copy of the complaint, this order and summons without prepayment of costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/22/08. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION ANGELA DENISE WILSON ADC #708565 V. JOHN MAPLES et al. ORDE R Plaintiff filed this complaint on July 15, 2008. On October 2, 2008, the undersigned entered findings and recommendations that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Brandy Wilson, Stephen Gilbert, and Linda Dixon, be dismissed, due to Plaintiff's failure to articulate any specific claims against them (docket entry #4). On October 14, 2008, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and provided specific allegations against Wilson, Gilbert, and Dixon (docket entry #6). In light of those objections, United States District Judge Brian S. Miller rejected the findings and recommendation (docket entry #21). Accordingly, service is appropriate on Wilson, Gilbert, and Dix on. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT service is appropriate on Defendants Brandy Wilson, Stephen Gilbert, and Linda Dixon, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint (docket entry #2), this order, and summons, upon said Defendants, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. DATED this 22 day of October, 2008. NO: 1:08CV00041 BSM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?