Hopper v. Norris et al

Filing 79

ORDER adopting 75 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, deft's 66 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and pltf's complaint against him is DISMISSED with prejudice; denying pltf's 78 Motion to Amend Complaint; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/23/09. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION CARL MICHAEL HOPPER, ADC #115793 v. DR. J. IRVIN, ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment (DE #66) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint against him is DISMISSED with prejudice.1 An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2009. 1:09CV00007SWW/HLJ DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff's motion [doc.#78] to amend his complaint has been considered by the Court and is hereby denied. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?