Weggeland Development Group Ltd v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Summary Judgment; amended compaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/4/09. (mkf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION WEGGELAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LTD v. CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00018 BSM PLAINTIFF
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.; and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS CONSERVATOR FOR INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, F.S.B. ORDER
Before the court is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for IndyMac Bank F.S.B. ("FDIC-R"), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Conservator for IndyMac Federal Bank, F.S.B. ("FDIC-C"). FDIC-R and FDIC-C assert that plaintiff Weggeland Development Group, LTD ("Weggeland") failed to exhaust the claims process set forth in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), specifically 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(3)-(20), and thus, the court does not have jurisdiction to hear these claims. In response, Weggeland concedes that summary judgment is appropriate, subject to the reservation of its right to reinstitute proceedings in this court should adequate relief not be gained through the administrative claims process. Thus, summary judgment is granted. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8) is granted. The amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2009.
________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?