Miller/Perry v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al

Filing 10

ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve defts with the complaint and amended complaint and summons in care of ADC Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550 without prepayment of costs therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 6/18/09. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION FRANCES RENEE MILLER/PERRY, ADC #708998 v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al. ORDER By Order dated June 5, 2009 (DE #5), this Court granted plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. However, finding plaintiff's complaint too vague and conclusory to enable the Court to determine whether it is frivolous, fails to state a claim, or states a legitimate claim, the Court directed plaintiff to submit an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff has now submitted an amended complaint (DE #7). Having reviewed the original and amended complaints, and construing them together, it now appears to the Court that service is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the defendants John Maples, Kelly Dyer, Judy Taylor, and Sara Sallas. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the defendants and the United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the original (DE #1) and amended complaints (DE #7) and summons on defendants in care of the Arkansas Board of Correction and 1:09CV00025HLJ DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF Community Punishment Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2009. __________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?