Hardy et al v. Bartmess

Filing 263

JUDGMENT re 262 Order dismissing the Hardy entities' active complaint and Bartmess's counterclaim with prejudice, pursuant to a settlement agreement reached by the parties. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/18/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES HARDY, JR.; HARDY RESOURCES, LLC; B&H RESOURCES, LLC; MARY HARDY; HARDY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; ELITE COIL TUBING SOLUTIONS, LLC; and NORTHSTAR FARMS, LLC v. PLAINTIFFS No.l:09-cv-41-DPM HELEN BARTMESS, Executrix of the Estate of George Bartmess DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement, the Hardy entities' active complaint, Document No. 30, and Bartmess's counterclaim, Document No. 48, are dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 18 January 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?