Miller/Perry v. Anderson et al
ORDER denying 60 Motion to Compel without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/15/10. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION FRANCES RENEE MILLER/PERRY, ADC #708998 v. DONALD ANDERSON, et al. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 60). Defendants filed Responses to the Motion (Doc. Nos. 61, 63). In her Motion, Plaintiff states she is not permitted sufficient time in which to review her medical records in order to prepare for her trial, and Defendants have not produced requested discovery. In their Responses, Defendants state they have submitted to Plaintiff all discovery requested. In addition, Defendants state Plaintiff has been approved for extra time in which to review her medical records. In light of these Responses, together with this Court's decision (by separate Order) to grant Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 60) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2010. 1:09-cv-00065-JTK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?