Miller/Perry v. Anderson et al

Filing 8

ORDER that service is appropriate for the defts Anderson, Tiner, Dunavion, Wayland, Forkum and Lavendar and directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons and the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the original and amended complaints and summons on defts in care of Humphries and Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of costs therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 2/22/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . _ - - _. . _. . . . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION FRANCES RENEE MILLER/PERRY, ADC #708998 v. DONALD ANDERSON, et al. ORDER By Order dated January 12,2010 (DE #5), this Court granted plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. However, finding plaintiffs complaint too vague and conclusory to enable the Court to determine whether it is frivolous, fails to state a claim, or states a legitimate claim, the Court directed plaintiffto submit an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiffhas now submitted an amended complaint (DE #7). Having reviewed the original and amended complaints, and construing them together, it now appears to the Court that service is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the defendants Anderson, Tiner, Dunavion, Wayland, Forkum, and Lavendar. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare 1:09CV00065BSMlHLJ DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF summons for the defendants and the United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the original (DE #1) and amended complaints (DE #7) and summons on defendants in care of Humphries and Lewis Law Firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of February, 2010. United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?