Kelly v. Hudspeth et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting defts' 16 Motion to Compel Discovery; pltf is directed to answer defts' discovery requests on or before 3/22/11. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/9/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
Kelly v. Hudspeth et al Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION STEPHEN GLENN KELLY V. TODD HUDSPETH, ET AL. CASE NO. 1:10CV00031 JMM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF ORDER For good cause shown, Defendants's Motion for Order Compelling Answers to Discovery Requests is granted (#16). Plaintiff is directed to answer Defendants's August 20, 2010 propounded Interrogatories and Request for Production including the Medical Authorization. Plaintiff is directed to return these answers and documents, including the signed Medical Authorization form to Defendants on, or before, March 22, 2011. Failure to do so may result in Plaintiff's case being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is directed to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the United States District courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas which states that it is the duty of parties appearing pro se to "monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. . . . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9 day of March , 2011. James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?