Richardson v. Navistar Inc et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion to Strike. Richardson may have until February 27, 2012 to respond to Navistar's motion about Mr. Berry. The Court admonishes Richardson to stop filing motions to strike when what it really needs is more time to respond. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/9/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ALICIA RICHARDSON, Individually and as
Administratrix of the Estate of
SANDY OSBURN, Deceased
NAVISTAR, INC.; INTERNATIONAL TRUCK
AND ENGINE CORPORATION; and NAVISTAR
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP.
Richardson's motion, Document No. 96, is granted in part and denied in
part. Richardson may have until 27 February 2012 to respond to Navistar's
motion about Mr. Berry. An insufficient basis exists to strike Navistar's
motion. And the Court admonishes Richardson to stop filing motions to
strike when what it really needs is more time to respond. Absent some
extraordinary circumstances, such as the ones presented by Navistar's
defective Local Rule 56.1 statement, the Court will not be striking court
papers. Richardson should devote her time to responding on the merits
rather than procedural skirmishing.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?