Dorsey v. Page et al
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Partial Report and Recommendations dismissing plaintiff's inhumane conditions of confinement claim without prejudice and allowing plaintiff to proceed with his excessive force claim; and certifying that an ifp appeal taken fro m this Order would not be taken in good faith; directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, complaint and this Order on defts Page, Heir and Loggains without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/2/10. (bkp)
Dorsey v. Page et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL DORSEY ADC #113528 V. JOE PAGE, Warden, Grimes Unit, et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A: (a) Plaintiff's 1:10CV00046 JMM/JTR DEFENDANTS
inhumane conditions of confinement claim is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, because he has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and (b) Plaintiff shall PROCEED with his excessive force claim. 2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), than an in forma
pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 3. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants Page, Heir, and Loggains,
and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.
Dated this 2nd day of August, 2010.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?