Horton v. Day et al
Filing
71
ORDER denying 69 Motion for Order; granting plaintiff's 70 Motion to Dismiss Party Hudspeth from his Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 3/31/11. (kpr)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION BRADY LEE HORTON, ADC #122529 1:10-cv-00061-JTK JASON DAY, et al. ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Order, asking the Court to require the parties to be subject to polygraph examinations (Doc. No. 69) is hereby DENIED. The Court denied this same request in its February 28, 2011 Order (Doc. No. 67). Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Hudspeth from his Complaint (Doc. No. 70) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2011. DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
__________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
