Dunkin v. Morales

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, Dunkin's complaint is dismissed with prejudice; this dismissal counts as a "strike"; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/27/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JERAD KEITH DUNKIN ADC #144105 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:11-cv-11-DPM DEFENDANT RICKY MORALES ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge H. David Young's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No.4, and Jerad Dunkin's objections, Document No. 10. After a de novo review, FED. R. ClV. P. 72(b)(3), the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Young's proposal. Dunkin's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.s.C. § 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?