Jones v. Malott et al
Filing
10
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Young's proposal; and dismissing Jones's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/20/11. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BATESVILLE DIVISION
DIANE JONES
ADC#706096
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 1:11-cv-15-DPM
RANDALL W. MALOTT, RUDICK,
McCLUSKY, and LUSTER
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge H. David Young's
Proposed Findings and Recommendations - to which Diane Jones has not
objected. The Court sees no legal error and no clear error of fact on the face
of this record as a whole. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to
1983 addition).
The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge Young's
proposal, Document No.8. Jones's complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order
would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.s.C.A. § 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?