Jones v. Malott et al

Filing 10

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Young's proposal; and dismissing Jones's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/20/11. (hph)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION DIANE JONES ADC#706096 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:11-cv-15-DPM RANDALL W. MALOTT, RUDICK, McCLUSKY, and LUSTER DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge H. David Young's Proposed Findings and Recommendations - to which Diane Jones has not objected. The Court sees no legal error and no clear error of fact on the face of this record as a whole. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition). The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge Young's proposal, Document No.8. Jones's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.s.C.A. § 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?