Vanpelt v. Oxner et al

Filing 93

ORDER denying 72 Motion for Reconsideration re 67 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations; denying 73 Supplemental Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/25/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION MARIO KEITH VANPELT v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:11-cv-00019 KGB-BD JACK OXNER et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending are plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and supplemental motion for reconsideration (Dkt. Nos. 72, 73). Plaintiff’s motions are denied. Plaintiff first seeks reconsideration of the order denying his motion to amend his complaint to add a claim for retaliation. Subsequent to the filing of plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and supplemental motion for reconsideration, plaintiff sought and was granted leave to amend his complaint to allege a retaliation claim (Dkt. Nos. 84, 88). Therefore, the Court denies as moot plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the order denying his previous motion to amend. Plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of the order denying his motion to compel. Judge Deere denied plaintiff’s motion to compel based on defendants’ representation that they had fully responded to plaintiff’s discovery requests. In his supplemental motion for reconsideration, plaintiff acknowledges certain documents he seeks are in the possession of the Arkansas Department of Correction (“ADC”) and states that he will seek an order compelling the ADC to produce the documents. Plaintiff’s motion to compel did not seek to compel production from the ADC. It does not appear that, prior to filing the motion to compel, plaintiff sought production of documents from the ADC; the ADC is not a party to this action. Consequently, Judge Deere’s order denying plaintiff’s motion to compel did not rule on the issue of production of documents in possession of the ADC. For these reasons, the Court denies plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the order denying his motion to compel. SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2012. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?