Brown v. Crown Pointe Timesharing Inc et al
ORDER granting 31 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice under Rule 41 filed by David Brown and DISMISSING CASE. The Court notes that Plaintiff's right to re-file the case against the Defendants is subject to the provisions of Rule 41(d) of the FRCP. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/28/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NO. 1:11CV00022 JMM
TIMESHARING INC., VICKI WHITED.
Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Dismiss. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion (Docket
# 31) should be, and hereby is, GRANTED. The Court notes that Plaintiff’s right to re-file the
case against the Defendants is subject to the provisions of Rule 41(d) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Under Rule 41(d), the Plaintiff may be ordered to pay any costs of this action
which the Court deems appropriate if Plaintiff re-files the action against the Defendants.
The Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 31) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close the
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of December, 2011.
James M. Moody
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?