Forrest et al v. Bowers et al

Filing 64

ORDER ADOPTING 61 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to introduce sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/23/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION KEITH TYLER FORREST, et al. v. PLAINTIFFS NO. 1:11CV00026 JLH KEITH BOWERS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs’ complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to introduce sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 23rd day of April, 2012. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?