Forrest et al v. Bowers et al

Filing 64

ORDER ADOPTING 61 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to introduce sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/23/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
KEITH TYLER FORREST, et al.
v.

PLAINTIFFS
NO. 1:11CV00026 JLH

KEITH BOWERS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiffs’ complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to introduce

sufficient evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 23rd day of April, 2012.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE