Tucker et al v. Southwestern Energy Company et al
Filing
127
ORDER setting forth the particulars of the telephone conference on June 14, 2012. The Amended Scheduling Order's ddls about experts are revised, as set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/14/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES TUCKER; MINDY TUCKER;
RONALD HOLLARS; FRANCES
ANN HOLLARS; PHILLIP BERRY; and
PEGGY BERRY
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Nos. 1:11-cv-44-DPM
1:11-cv-45-DPM
SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY CO.
and BHP BILLITON PETROLEUM
(FAYETTEVILLE) LLC
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court held a telephone conference on 14 June 2012 to resolve the
issues raised in the parties' joint report and request for discovery ruling,
Document No. 125. The Court ruled orally at the end of the conference. Here
are the particulars.
Southwestern Energy will meet its proposed June and July dates for
rolling production, with full production by 9 July 2012.
Plaintiffs will
immediately prioritize the needed production; and Southwestern Energy will
follow these priorities in producing materials. By agreement, production is
limited (at this point) to materials about wells within a one-mile radius of
Plaintiffs' properties. The parties will confer as soon as possible and do their
best to agree to a protocol for electronic discovery. The protocol should make
production of email both adequate for Plaintiffs and manageable for
Southwestern Energy. Joint report to the Court on electronic discovery due
by 19 June 2012. The Amended Final Scheduling Order's deadlines about
experts (on the class issues and the named Plaintiffs' claims) are revised:
• Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures
with Reports ......................... 17 August 2012
• Defendants' Expert Disclosures
with Reports ......................... 14 September 2012
• Rebuttal Expert Disclosures
with Reports ......................... 28 September 2012
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?