Hicks v. Arkansas Department of Correction
ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; dismissal constitutes a "strike"; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/9/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BRIAN JAMES HICKS,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00047 BSM/JTR
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 6] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been received. No objections have been
filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the
record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No.
6] should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to state a claim.
Dismissal constitutes a “strike” as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this
order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of August 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?