Campbell v. Johnston et al

Filing 16

ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of the complaint, the amended complaint, with any attachments, and a summons on defts through the Compliance Office of the ADC, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees. The Clerk also is instructed to re-docket Ms. Campbell's exhibits as her amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/29/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION SHALONDA CAMPBELL ADC #710039 V. PLAINTIFF No. 1:11CV00088 DPM-BD JOHNNY JOHNSTON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Shalonda Campbell, an Arkansas Department of Correction (“ADC”) inmate, filed this action pro se. Because Ms. Campbell’s original complaint was deficient, she was ordered to file an amended complaint providing more information regarding her federal (constitutional) claims. She has now filed an amended complaint (docketed as exhibits). (Docket entry #15) Ms. Campbell has stated an excessive force claim against each of the named Defendants: Johnny Johnston, Kramer Jones, and Candy Ashby. Accordingly, service is proper for those Defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants Johnston, Jones, and Ashby; and the United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint (#2) and amended complaint (#15), with any attachments, and a summons for these Defendants through the Compliance Division of the Arkansas Department of Correction, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71612 , without prepayment of fees and costs or posting security. The Clerk of the Court also is instructed to re-docket Ms. Campbell’s exhibits (#15) as her amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2011. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?