Kemp v. Huffman et al
Filing
22
ORDER directing the Clerk to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of deft Jonathon Noel. The Clerk shall prepare summons for Noel and Huffman, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint, and this order, on them at the addresses provided under seal, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 5/4/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BATESVILLE DIVISION
MARVIN L. KEMP
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 1:12CV00001 DPM/HDY
NATHEN HUFFMAN et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff filed this complaint on January 9, 2012, and service was ordered. On May 2, 2012,
the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendants Jonathon Noel and Nathen Huffman (docket
entries #20 & #21). Service had been attempted in the care of the Arkansas Department of
Correction, but was returned because Noel and Huffman are no longer employed there. However,
Noel’s and Huffman’s last known addresses were provided and filed under seal.1 Accordingly,
service will be attempted at those addresses.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Clerk is directed to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of
Defendant Jonathon Noel.
2.
Noel’s and Huffman’s last known addresses shall not be made part of any public
3.
The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a summons for Noel and Huffman, and the
record.
United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint (docket
entry #2), and this order, on them, at the addresses provided under seal, without prepayment of fees
and costs or security therefor.
1
Noel’s correct full name was also provided.
1
4.
Upon re-issuance of the summons and complaint, the United States Marshal is hereby
directed to send Plaintiff’s copy of process to the Clerk of the Court, who shall then remove the
addresses prior to forwarding a copy to Plaintiff.
DATED this
4
day of May, 2012.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?