Doss v. Maples et al
ORDER ADOPTING 27 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/29/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JOY D. DOSS,
JOHN MAPLES, Warden; and
DALE MORGAN, Mailroom Clerk,
McPherson Unit, ADC
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections.1
After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the
record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff filed her objections more than fourteen days after entry of the proposed findings
and recommended disposition. However, the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC)
notified the Court, by letter dated August 24, 2012 (docket entry #29), that the objections would
have been received by the Clerk’s Office on August 17, 2012 but for an inadvertent error on the
part of ADC mail room staff. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #20) is
GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?