Robinson v. Lucas et al
ORDER ADOPTING 6 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf may proceed with his inadequate medical care and retaliation claims against defts in their individual capacities only; pltf's official capacity claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaints 3 5 , and this Order on defts without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/13/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Sheriff of Jackson County, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No
objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff may PROCEED with his inadequate medical care and retaliation
claims against Defendants in their individual capacities only.
Plaintiff’s official capacity claims are DISMISSED, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants, and the U.S.
Marshal is directed to serve the summons, Complaint, Amended Complaint, and this
Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.1
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 13th day of August 2012.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
If any of the Defendants are no longer Jackson County employees, the
individual responding to service shall file his last known private mailing address
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?