Meadows v. Anderson et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 5 Partial Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge. Defendants Donald Anderson, Linda Dixon, and Corizon, Inc., are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs claims for violations of the Arkansas Rights of the Terminally Ill or Permanently Unconscious Act, the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, the First Amendment, and the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment are dismissed without prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/19/2012. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
TERESE MARIE MEADOWS
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:12CV00089 BSM/BD

DONALD ANDERSON, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 5] submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere have been reviewed. No objections have been
filed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the
proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved
and adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendants Donald Anderson, Linda Dixon, and Corizon, Inc., are dismissed

from this action without prejudice.
2.

Plaintiff Terese Meadows’s claims for violations of the Arkansas Rights of the

Terminally Ill or Permanently Unconscious Act, the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process
Clause, the First Amendment, and the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment are
dismissed without prejudice.
3.

It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order is

considered frivolous and not in good faith.

Dated this 19th day of October 2012.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2