Abdulaziz/Askew v. Williams et al
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/16/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CORY WILLIAMS, et al.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 43). Defendants
filed a Response in opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 44).
In his Motion, Plaintiff states Defendants failed to provide him with requested discovery,
because they did not provide him with copies of his mental health records and because not all of the
Defendants signed the discovery responses.
In Response, Defendants state that Arkansas
Department of Correction (ADC) policy forbids providing inmates with copies of their medical and
mental health records, and that Plaintiff has been provided opportunities to review his records and
make notes. In addition, not all of the present Defendants were part of this lawsuit at the time the
discovery was propounded; therefore, they did not all sign the responses. Finally, Defendants note
that Plaintiff failed to comply with FED.R.CIV.P. 37(a)(1), which requires a movant to confer in good
faith with the opposing party prior to filing a motion to compel, and to provide a certificate of good
The Court finds that Plaintiff’s Motion should be denied and that Defendants have
adequately responded to his discovery requests. ADC policy forbids copies of medical and mental
health records and Plaintiff does not claim that he has been denied the opportunity to review the
relevant records for this lawsuit. In addition, Defendants present an adequate explanation for
lacking the signatures of all the Defendants. Finally, the Court finds that any failure in the future
of either party to comply with the good faith Rule requirements will render the automatic denial of
a motion to compel. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 43) is
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2013.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?