Sargent v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al

Filing 8

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The motion for a temporary retraining order is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/13. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BATESVILLE DIVISION

MARY ROSEALISA RING TILLERY SARGENT
ADC #710323
V.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 1:12-cv-127-KGB-JTR

CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al.

DEFENDANTS

OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Mary Sargent has filed this pro se § 1983 action. On December 6, 2012, the
Court gave Ms. Sargent 30 days to file an amended complaint containing information necessary
to complete § 1915A screening (Dkt. No. 5). Importantly, the Court advised Ms. Sargent that if
she failed to timely and properly do so, this case would be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant
to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
As of today’s date, Ms. Sargent has not filed her amended complaint and the time for
doing so has expired.
The case is dismissed without prejudice. The motion for a temporary restraining order or
preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is denied as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2013.

________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE