Sargent v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The motion for a temporary retraining order is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MARY ROSEALISA RING TILLERY SARGENT
Case No. 1:12-cv-127-KGB-JTR
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al.
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Mary Sargent has filed this pro se § 1983 action. On December 6, 2012, the
Court gave Ms. Sargent 30 days to file an amended complaint containing information necessary
to complete § 1915A screening (Dkt. No. 5). Importantly, the Court advised Ms. Sargent that if
she failed to timely and properly do so, this case would be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant
to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
As of today’s date, Ms. Sargent has not filed her amended complaint and the time for
doing so has expired.
The case is dismissed without prejudice. The motion for a temporary restraining order or
preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is denied as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2013.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?