Sargent v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al

Filing 8

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The motion for a temporary retraining order is denied as moot. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION MARY ROSEALISA RING TILLERY SARGENT ADC #710323 V. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:12-cv-127-KGB-JTR CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al. DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Mary Sargent has filed this pro se § 1983 action. On December 6, 2012, the Court gave Ms. Sargent 30 days to file an amended complaint containing information necessary to complete § 1915A screening (Dkt. No. 5). Importantly, the Court advised Ms. Sargent that if she failed to timely and properly do so, this case would be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). As of today’s date, Ms. Sargent has not filed her amended complaint and the time for doing so has expired. The case is dismissed without prejudice. The motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 2) is denied as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2013. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?