Neal v. Lucas et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 and dismissing the case without prejudice. Dismissal of this complaint constitutes a strike within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/20/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DAVID LUCAS, Sheriff,
Jackson County; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s complaint (Dkt. No. 2) is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1915A(b), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of the complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2013.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?