Jennings v. Doe et al
Filing
6
ORDER adopting the 4 Report and Recommendations as the Court's own opinion, with one change: Jennings's 2 complaint is dismissed without prejudice. A strike is assessed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/12/2013. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JUSTIN H. JENNINGS,
ADC #109702
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 1:12-cv-137-DPM-JTK
DR. DOE, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Jennings has not objected to Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney's
recommendation, Document No. 4, that his complaint be dismissed for failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. As Judge Kearney also
noted, Jennings did not comply with the 10 January 2013 Order requiring
Jennings to supplement his complaint with specific allegations of misconduct.
And it appears from the docket that Jennings has not complied with his
obligation under Local Rule5.5(c)(2) to ensure the Court has a current address
for him.
Reviewing Judge Kearney's recommendation for legal error and
clear factual error on the face of the record, FED. R. CN. P. 72(b) (1983 addition
to Advisory Committee notes), the Court adopts the recommendation as its
own opinion, with one change: Jennings's complaint is dismissed without
prejudice. A strike is assessed.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?