Rashad v. Ferguson et al

Filing 137

ORDER adopting 135 proposed findings and recommendation in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 128 131 motions to dismiss; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's 2 complaint; finding as moot 122 124 . An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/11/2014. (mmd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION FAHIM JAMAL RASHAD v. PLAINTIFF Case No: 1:13-cv-00003 KGB/HDY JOHN FERGUSON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 135). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The motions to dismiss filed by defendants John Ferguson, Glenda Rose, and Donald Vaulner (Dkt. No. 128) and by Angela Dodd (Dkt. No. 131) are granted, and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s Orders, for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to prosecute. 2. All other pending motions are denied as moot. 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2014. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?