Murphy v. Hobbs et al

Filing 116

ORDER ADOPTING 111 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Murphy's 108 Motion to dismiss sixteen defendants granted. Her claims against Dykes, Phipps, Dickinson, Ayers, Dockins, Willis, Aiken, Ming, Allen, Dunavion, Williams, Richardson, Bryant, Chapman, Potter, and Gaza are dismissed without prejudice. The case will go forward against Hobbs, Maples, Faust, Dixon, Guy, Weekly, Robins, Evans, and Jones. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/14/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION LISA RYAN MURPHY ADC#760343 v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:13-cv-20-DPM-HDY RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC; JOHN MAPLES, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC; NURZUHAL FAUST, Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC; LINDA DIXON, Major, McPherson Unit, ADC; RICHARD GUY, Warden; AUNDREA WEEKLY, Warden; LINDA DYKES, Captain; BOBBIE PHIPPS, Correctional Officer; VIRGINA ROBINS, Sergeant; MICHAEL DICKINSON, Sergeant, ADC; ROGER AYERS, Sergeant, ADC; DAWN DOCKINS, C/0, ADC; KEVIN WILLIS, C/0, ADC; TAMI AIKEN, Captain, ADC; JASON MING, Lieutenant, ADC; PHILLIP ALLEN, Sergeant, ADC; LAVONDA DUNAVI ON, Inmate Grievance Coordinator, ADC; MARVIN EVANS, Assistant Director, ADC; MARY WILLIAMS, Sergeant, ADC; MICHAEL RICHARDSON, Lieutenant; DARRYL BRYANT, Sergeant, ADC; CHERYL CHAPMAN, Lieutenant, ADC; ROBERT POTTER, Sergeant, ADC; TIMOTHY GAZA, Sergeant; and KRAMER JONES, Lieutenant DEFENDANTS ORDER Unopposed recommendation, NQ 111, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Murphy's motion to voluntarily dismiss sixteen defendants, NQ 108, granted. Her claims against Dykes, Phipps, Dickinson, Ayers, Dockins, Willis, Aiken, Ming, Allen, Dunavion, Williams, Richardson, Bryant, Chapman, Potter, and Gaza are dismissed without prejudice. The case will go forward against Hobbs, Maples, Faust, Dixon, Guy, Weekly, Robins, Evans, and Jones. So Ordered. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?