Murphy v. Hobbs et al
Filing
116
ORDER ADOPTING 111 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Murphy's 108 Motion to dismiss sixteen defendants granted. Her claims against Dykes, Phipps, Dickinson, Ayers, Dockins, Willis, Aiken, Ming, Allen, Dunavion, Williams, Richardson, Bryant, Chapman, Potter, and Gaza are dismissed without prejudice. The case will go forward against Hobbs, Maples, Faust, Dixon, Guy, Weekly, Robins, Evans, and Jones. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/14/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
LISA RYAN MURPHY
ADC#760343
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 1:13-cv-20-DPM-HDY
RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC; JOHN MAPLES,
Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC; NURZUHAL FAUST,
Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC; LINDA DIXON,
Major, McPherson Unit, ADC; RICHARD GUY,
Warden; AUNDREA WEEKLY, Warden; LINDA
DYKES, Captain; BOBBIE PHIPPS, Correctional
Officer; VIRGINA ROBINS, Sergeant; MICHAEL
DICKINSON, Sergeant, ADC; ROGER AYERS,
Sergeant, ADC; DAWN DOCKINS, C/0, ADC;
KEVIN WILLIS, C/0, ADC; TAMI AIKEN,
Captain, ADC; JASON MING, Lieutenant, ADC;
PHILLIP ALLEN, Sergeant, ADC; LAVONDA
DUNAVI ON, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,
ADC; MARVIN EVANS, Assistant Director, ADC;
MARY WILLIAMS, Sergeant, ADC; MICHAEL
RICHARDSON, Lieutenant; DARRYL BRYANT,
Sergeant, ADC; CHERYL CHAPMAN, Lieutenant,
ADC; ROBERT POTTER, Sergeant, ADC; TIMOTHY
GAZA, Sergeant; and KRAMER JONES, Lieutenant
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Unopposed recommendation, NQ 111, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3)
(1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Murphy's motion to voluntarily
dismiss sixteen defendants, NQ 108, granted. Her claims against Dykes,
Phipps, Dickinson, Ayers, Dockins, Willis, Aiken, Ming, Allen, Dunavion,
Williams, Richardson, Bryant, Chapman, Potter, and Gaza are dismissed
without prejudice. The case will go forward against Hobbs, Maples, Faust,
Dixon, Guy, Weekly, Robins, Evans, and Jones.
So Ordered.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?