Bales et al v. Doe

Filing 9

ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice, under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with a Court Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 13-83. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
TODD BALES
v.

PLAINTIFF
NO. 1:13CV00083 JLH/BD

JANE DOE

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Plaintiff Todd Bales, an Independence County inmate, filed this case pro se, alleging
that his constitutional rights were violated.1 In his complaint, Bales named “Miss D” as the
only defendant. On October 21, 2013, Bales was ordered to identify and serve Miss D
within 120 days. He was specifically warned that his case could be dismissed if he did not
comply with the Court Order.
Bales has not complied with the Court’s Order, and the time allowed for doing so has
passed. Accordingly, his claims are dismissed, without prejudice, under Local Rule
5.5(c)(2), for failure to comply with a Court Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th of March, 2014.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Bales originally filed this case on behalf of himself and Caldwell Perston, another
Independence County inmate. The Court previously dismissed Perston as a party plaintiff.