Mitchell v. Arkansas Department of Correction
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 11 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED PARTIAL DISPOSITION in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Plaintiff's claim against ADC with prejudice; dismissing Plaintiff's claim a gainst Doss without prejudice. Mr. Martin may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against defendant King. The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a summons for defendant K. King; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, c omplaint, amended complaint and this Order on her through the Humphries and Odum law firm without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/05/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
KEVIN MARTIN MITCHELL, SR.
Case No. 1:13-cv-00092 KGB/JTR
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,
Grimes Unit, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 11). No objections have
been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed.
After careful review, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
Plaintiff Kevin Martin Mitchell, Sr.’s claim against the ADC is dismissed with
Mr. Martins’ claim against defendant Doss is dismissed without prejudice.
Mr. Martin may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against defendant
The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a summons for defendant K. King.
The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, and this
Order on her through the Humphries and Odum law firm without prepayment of fees and costs or
security therefor. If Ms. King is no longer an employee of Correctional Care Services, the
Humphries and Odum law firm is directed to file a sealed statement containing Ms. King’s last
known private mailing address.
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 5th day of May, 2014.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?