Patterson v. Tims
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve summons and the amended complaint on defts Tims, Rogers and Budnik without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/8/14. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ROGER TIMS, et al.
By Order dated November 27, 2013 (Doc. No. 3), this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to
Proceed in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, finding
Plaintiff’s Complaint too vague and conclusory to enable the Court to determine whether it is
frivolous, fails to state a claim, or states a legitimate claim, the Court provided him the opportunity
to submit an Amended Complaint within thirty days. The Court also cautioned Plaintiff that an
Amended Complaint would render the Original Complaint without legal effect, and would take the
place of his Original Complaint. Plaintiff has now submitted an Amended Complaint, adding as
Defendants Lt. Rogers and Deputy Warden Budnik (Doc. No. 5). Having reviewed the Amended
Complaint for screening purposes only,1 it now appears to the Court that service is appropriate for
Defendants Tims, Rogers, and Budnik. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the Defendants Tims,
Rogers, and Budnik. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the Defendants and the
United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 5)
and summons on Defendants in care of the Arkansas Board of Correction and Community
The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires federal courts to screen prisoner complaints
seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28 U.S.C. Sect. 1915A(a).
Punishment Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, without
prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2014.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?