May v. Maples et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 29 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. May's 26 Motion to Amend is granted. May's claims against Guy, Weekly, Budnik, Pickering, Hill, Hennessey, Riker, Hutchinson, Simmons, and Crowell are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/28/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH W. MAY ADC # 100355 v. PLAINTIFF No.1:13-cv-113-DPM-HDY JOHN MAPLES, JR., Former Warden, Grimes Unit; RICHARD L. GUY, Former Warden, Grimes Unit; JONATHAN PICKERING, Lieutenant/Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; PAUL BURNSIDE, Sergeant/Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; JEFFREY RIZER, Sergeant/Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; ANTONIO GARCIA, Sergeant/STTG Gang Coordinator, Grimes Unit; CHAD DAVIS, Sergeant/Correctional Officer/Armory, Grimes Unit; JAMES HILL, Sergeant/Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; RYAN HENNESSEY, Sergeant/Correctional Officer/Seg-Supervisor, Grimes Unit; CALVIN FORD, Corporal/ Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; TREVOR STEVENSON, Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; ARIC SIMMONS, Nurse (APN)fHealth Services, Grimes Unit; ALFREDO ANTE, Correctional Officer (CO-I), Grimes Unit; RICKY JEFFREY, Grievance Coordinator, Grimes Unit; RICHARD RIKER, Health Services, Grimes Unit; BETTY HUTCHINSON, (APN), Provider of Health Services, Grimes Unit; MARRIE PETTY, Nurse (LPN), Health Services, Grimes Unit; JANA CROWELL, Nurse (LPN), Health Services, Grimes Unit; AUDREY WEEKLY, Warden, Grimes Unit; and CHRISTOPHER T. BUDNIK, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit DEFENDANTS ORDER Unopposed recommendation, NQ 29, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). May's motion to amend, NQ 26, granted. May's claims against Guy, Weekly, Budnik, Pickering, Hill, Hennessey, Riker, Hutchinson, Simmons, and Crowell are dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered. {l D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?