May v. Maples et al
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING 29 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. May's 26 Motion to Amend is granted. May's claims against Guy, Weekly, Budnik, Pickering, Hill, Hennessey, Riker, Hutchinson, Simmons, and Crowell are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/28/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOSEPH W. MAY
ADC # 100355
v.
PLAINTIFF
No.1:13-cv-113-DPM-HDY
JOHN MAPLES, JR., Former Warden, Grimes
Unit; RICHARD L. GUY, Former Warden,
Grimes Unit; JONATHAN PICKERING,
Lieutenant/Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit;
PAUL BURNSIDE, Sergeant/Correctional
Officer, Grimes Unit; JEFFREY RIZER,
Sergeant/Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit;
ANTONIO GARCIA, Sergeant/STTG Gang
Coordinator, Grimes Unit; CHAD DAVIS,
Sergeant/Correctional Officer/Armory, Grimes
Unit; JAMES HILL, Sergeant/Correctional
Officer, Grimes Unit; RYAN HENNESSEY,
Sergeant/Correctional Officer/Seg-Supervisor,
Grimes Unit; CALVIN FORD, Corporal/
Correctional Officer, Grimes Unit; TREVOR
STEVENSON, Correctional Officer, Grimes
Unit; ARIC SIMMONS, Nurse (APN)fHealth
Services, Grimes Unit; ALFREDO ANTE,
Correctional Officer (CO-I), Grimes Unit;
RICKY JEFFREY, Grievance Coordinator,
Grimes Unit; RICHARD RIKER, Health
Services, Grimes Unit; BETTY HUTCHINSON,
(APN), Provider of Health Services, Grimes
Unit; MARRIE PETTY, Nurse (LPN), Health
Services, Grimes Unit; JANA CROWELL,
Nurse (LPN), Health Services, Grimes Unit;
AUDREY WEEKLY, Warden, Grimes Unit;
and CHRISTOPHER T. BUDNIK, Deputy
Warden, Grimes Unit
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Unopposed recommendation, NQ 29, adopted.
FED.
R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3)
(1983 addition to advisory committee notes). May's motion to amend, NQ 26,
granted.
May's claims against Guy, Weekly, Budnik, Pickering, Hill,
Hennessey, Riker, Hutchinson, Simmons, and Crowell are dismissed without
prejudice.
So Ordered.
{l
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?