Williams v. Hill

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 4 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; and dismissing Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/14/2014. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES E. WILLIAMS
ADC #78429
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO: 1:14CV00021 BSM

JAMES A. HILL

DEFENDANT
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge H. David Young, along with the objections filed, have been reviewed.
After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this
case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.
2.

This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3.

It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 14th day of April 2014.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE