Simmons v. Jackson County Arkansas et al
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a strike. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/18/2015. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 1:14-cv-00022 KGB/JTR
JACKSON COUNTY ARKANSAS; and
BROCK, Chief Deputy
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 7). No objections have been filed, and
the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failing
to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a strike, as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?