Rushing v. Guy et al
ORDER adopting 104 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing without prejudice for failure to prosecute plaintiff Ricky Lee Rushing's claims against Mr. Jones; and denying as moot Mr. Jones's 78 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/18/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RICKY LEE RUSHING
Case No. 1:14-cv-00028-KGB-JTK
WARDEN GUY, et al.
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 104). There have been no objections, and the
time for filing objections has passed.
After a review of the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered
that, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), the Court dismisses without prejudice for failure to
prosecute plaintiff Ricky Lee Rushing’s claims against Mr. Jones. The Court denies as moot Mr.
Jones’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 78).
SO ORDERED this the 18th day of November, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?