Rushing v. Guy et al

Filing 95

ORDER adopting in their entirety 87 Proposed Findings and Recommendations and denying 81 motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, which this Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
RICKY LEE RUSHING
ADC #65405
v.

PLAINTIFF

Case No. 1:14-cv-00028-KGB-JTK

WARDEN GUY, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 87). There have been no objections, and the time
for filing objections has passed. After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations,
the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s
motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, which this Court construes as
a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt. No. 81).
SO ORDERED this the 8th day of June, 2015.

________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE