Thompson v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Filing 32

ORDER dismissing Evelyn Thompson's claims against defendant LINA pursuant to 29 stipulation of dismissal without prejudice with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees and denying as moot 28 unopposed motion for extension of time. Ms. Thompson's claims against ConAgra Foods, Inc., and ConAgra Foods, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan X60 remain pending. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/09/2014. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION EVELYN THOMPSON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:14-cv-00041 KGB LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff Evelyn Thompson’s stipulation of dismissal without prejudice (Dkt. No. 29). Ms. Thompson requests that her claims against defendant Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”) be dismissed without prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Counsel for LINA has signed this stipulation of dismissal without prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court dismisses without prejudice Ms. Thompson’s claims against LINA. Each party will bear its own costs and fees incurred in the litigation. Prior to this stipulation of dismissal without prejudice, LINA filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to answer the second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 28). Because the Court has dismissed Ms. Thompson’s claims against LINA, the Court denies as moot this motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 28). Ms. Thompson’s claims against ConAgra Foods, Inc., and ConAgra Foods, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan X60 remain pending. SO ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2014. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?