Cody-Hassan v. Wiesenbach et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, he should submit, within 30 days, the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/3/2014. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STEPHEN CODY-HASSAN ADC # 146160 v. PLAINTIFF 1:14CV00049-JM-JJV WILLIAM WIESENBACH, JR.; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this case, he should submit within thirty (30) days of this Order: (a) the statutory filing fee of $400, in full, to the Clerk, noting the case style and number; and (b) a motion to reopen the case. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2014. ____________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?