Murphy v. Holland et al

Filing 4

ORDER adopting 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiffs 1 complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5 (c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's 2 order. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/27/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
LISA MURPHY, ADC #760343
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 1:14CV00070 JLH

HOLLAND, Correctional Officer,
McPherson Unit; and THOMAS,
Sergeant, McPherson Unit

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the

filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court’s order.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 27th day of August, 2014.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE