Henry v. Spicer et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT: Henry's claims against Sterling are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Henry's due process, excessive force, and outrage claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Henry's official- capacity claim for money damages against Spicer is dismissed with prejudice based on sovereign immunity. Henry's equal protection claim against Spicer is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/10/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTHONY HENRY
ADC#140754

v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 1:14-cv-71-DPM

KANE SPICER, Corporal, Grimes Unit, and
R. STERLING, Corporal, Grimes Unit

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
1. Henry's claims against Sterling are dismissed without prejudice for
failure to state a claim.
2. Henry's due process, excessive force, and outrage claims are
dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim.
3. Henry's official-capacity claim for money damages against Spicer is
dismissed with prejudice based on sovereign immunity.
4. Henry's equal protection claim against Spicer is dismissed with
prejudice.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. v
United States District Judge