Johnson v. Hubbard et al
ORDER ADOPTING 10 Partial Report and Recommendations; Plaintiff's 8 and 12 Motions for Preliminary Injunction are DENIED. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/8/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON,
ADC # 84494
HUBBARD, Correctional Officer,
Grimes Unit; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering Plaintiff’s
objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED.1
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 8th day of October, 2014.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On October 1, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No.
12), which is substantially similar to Plaintiff’s First Motion for Preliminary Injunction. For the
reasons set forth in the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Second Motion
for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 12) is DENIED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?