Meadows v. Maples et al

Filing 3

ORDER dismissing this case with prejudice due to a lack of prosecution. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/12/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION TERESE MARIE MEADOWS, ADC #707979 v. PLAINTIFF NO. 1:14CV00114 JLH-JTR JOHN MAPLES, JR., Former Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Terese Marie Meadows has filed this pro se § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated her constitutional rights. On October 6, 2014, the Court gave Meadows thirty days to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a substituted complaint. Importantly, the Court advised Meadows that, if she failed to timely do so, this case would be dismissed due to a lack of prosecution. Document #2. As of today’s date, Meadows has not complied with the October 6, 2014 Order, and the time for doing so has expired. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice due to a lack of prosecution. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of November, 2014. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?