Lyons v. Branscum et al
ORDER approving and adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; denying 5 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing Ms. Lyons to pay the filing fee of $400, together with a motion to reopen the case, within 10 da ys of the date of this Order, should she wish to continue this case; dismissing Ms. Lyons's 1 complaint and 12 amended complaint; denying as moot Ms. Lyons's other pending motions 8 9 17 19 20 21 . Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/21/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 1:14-cv-00117-KGB-JTK
BRANSCRUM, et al.
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 6). After a review of the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 7), as well as a de novo
review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety.
It is therefore ordered that:
Plaintiff Chandra Lyons’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied (Dkt.
Though Ms. Lyons states that she agreed to pay $50.00 per month (Dkt. Nos. 10,
11), based on the record, she has not paid the $400.00 statutory filing fee. Should Ms. Lyons
wish to continue in this case, she must submit the statutory filing fee of $400.00 to the Clerk,
noting the above case style and number, together with a motion to reopen the case, within 10
days of the date of this Order. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be
Ms. Lyons’s complaint and amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice.
Ms. Lyons’s other pending motions are denied without prejudice as moot (Dkt.
Nos. 8, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
SO ORDERED this the 21st day of May, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?