Lyons v. Williams et al

Filing 12

ORDER approving and adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying plaintiff Chandra Lyons's 6 7 10 motions to consolidate; denying Ms. Lyons's 3 application to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing without prejudice this case; and certifying that an in form pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/27/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION CHANDRA LYONS, ADC #704518 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:14-cv-00124 KGB/JTR B. WILLIAMS, McPherson Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 6). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court denies plaintiff Chandra Lyons’s motions to consolidate (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7, 2. The Court denies Ms. Lyons’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3. The Court dismisses without prejudice this case. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis 10). 3). appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED the 27th day of May, 2015. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?