Murphy v. Faust et al
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike," within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/18/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAUST, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment
dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2014.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?